Please don't take this the wrong way, but I had a question.
Why would you watermark a street shot?
These people don't even know you took this shot. It wasn't staged, or planned. They're not wearing costumes or makeup. You took the shot, but that's all that makes it yours, and the watermark is ruining our ability to appreciate this moment snatched out of time - a moment that for lack of your presence might have stayed with that couple, and that for lack of your camera, belonged to no one but them.
However! I understand that the internet is a dangerous place to be a visual artist. I've had works stolen, and so have my friends. I want you to know that I'm not trying to be a troll, and I'm not trying to deny your right as an artist to copyright and watermark your work. It just seems to me that street photography has less to do with who made the image (and by proxy, who is displaying the image) and more to do with what they managed to capture. Therefore, the watermark kind of seems superfluous, and it certainly takes away from an otherwise gorgeous image.
All that aside, though, I agree with your previous commenters. Your depth of field is stunning. It's incredibly difficult to achieve this kind of shot with moving people all around you, especially without your subjects noticing. It's a beautiful piece. Regardless of my opinion about the watermark, I'm glad you posted this, and I'm going to +fav it.
--
Like PK said, make the art they want you to make, but never forget to make your secret art.
--
When you try your best but you don't succeed When you get what you want but not what you need When you feel so tired but you can't sleep Stuck in reverse..
--
I'm not one of those artist who'll scream at you "Click My Name!" or "See My Gallery!", because you'll chose if you want to or not, regardless.
...But if you don't click my name or see my gallery...you'll regret it
Seriously.
--
I Suggest DDs!
Why would you watermark a street shot?
These people don't even know you took this shot. It wasn't staged, or planned. They're not wearing costumes or makeup. You took the shot, but that's all that makes it yours, and the watermark is ruining our ability to appreciate this moment snatched out of time - a moment that for lack of your presence might have stayed with that couple, and that for lack of your camera, belonged to no one but them.
However! I understand that the internet is a dangerous place to be a visual artist. I've had works stolen, and so have my friends. I want you to know that I'm not trying to be a troll, and I'm not trying to deny your right as an artist to copyright and watermark your work. It just seems to me that street photography has less to do with who made the image (and by proxy, who is displaying the image) and more to do with what they managed to capture. Therefore, the watermark kind of seems superfluous, and it certainly takes away from an otherwise gorgeous image.
All that aside, though, I agree with your previous commenters. Your depth of field is stunning. It's incredibly difficult to achieve this kind of shot with moving people all around you, especially without your subjects noticing. It's a beautiful piece. Regardless of my opinion about the watermark, I'm glad you posted this, and I'm going to +fav it.
--
Like PK said, make the art they want you to make, but never forget to make your secret art.
--
When you try your best but you don't succeed
When you get what you want but not what you need
When you feel so tired but you can't sleep
Stuck in reverse..
It's about couples photography , a big collection .. hope you like it
thanks
--
Such a sick elegance,
i've found there in your eyes ...
here
--
Your feels create your world...and your dreams are world, full of the best feels...
--
Your feels create your world...and your dreams are world, full of the best feels...
--
with six months off for bad behaviour.